Preface...this douche was posting OT in a thread about how democrats "own" the media". I was mocking him for being pigeon holed into a set camp etc...
I say---
ZZZZZZZZZ
I'm not biased, I have no political affiliation. I have no set religion. I am a free bird limited only by the 2 government parties that rule the country, both of which dictate media content to prosper themselves.
Well them and my credit cards limit that they just bumped up. Maybe I'll buy a house on credit cards. LOL
Douche says---
Seriously, does anyone believe this guy is unbiased?
He has no opinion on the second amendment?
No opinion on abortion?
No opinion on the war in Iraq?
No opinion on stem cell research?
No opinion on taxes?
The only way he could possibly be unbiased is if he has no opinion on any of these things.
Which obviously isn't the case.
So what are we to make of such a statement?
It's like the media today, they claim to be unbiased in their reporting. Who do they think they're kidding?
I say---
Ok fruit loop...I'll bite once since you're baiting me so hard after stirring an OT discussion in the index thread to wet your whistle.
Let's clear terminology up first as I see you're confused. NOT BIASED means I can see both sides of the story. I NEVER said I was NOT OPINIONATED. Let's not twist things to suit your needs as is typical with your posts.
To answer your questions and give my OPINIONS...
No opinion on the second amendment?
Honestly I only know the 1st amendment. What is the 2nd? If you ask me a direct question without propaganda surrounding it I'll give an honest answer.
No opinion on abortion?
NOPE...we'll I think it's the woman's choice. But as for right or wrong I could care less. I don't knock people up so I have no reason to have feelings here.
No opinion on the war in Iraq?
I do NOT agree with the war in Iraq. It was un-warranted and serves a purpose much different than the WMD bull$hit they purport IMO. If there was justification, and there really could have been I suppose, I don't believe in sending ground troops into an area where the majority have no respect for human life and kill themselves to get 100 virgin wives or whatever they believe over there. Air raid...there are no rules in war. Yet the US tries to "play fair" causing more US casualties than is needed.
No opinion on stem cell research?
Again NOPE. I could care less if some idiot wants to clone a dog for $50k. I could care less about making people live even longer with human made body parts and trying to cheat fate. People live way too long as it is, it impacts many resources to keep these walking corpses around in nursing homes for example. Sad but true, and I beg of those close to me to kill me before putting me into HELL on earth. If other people want to live to 200 and invest in that fine, not for me though.
No opinion on taxes?
LOL, well I feel the wealthy should cover more the burden due to the wickedly wide gap in wealth distribution. I have mixed feelings though and see both sides. Why should one that EARNED a fortune be raped for escaping middle class? I'll leave it at that cause this question has infinite gray areas.
Enjoy, I'm sure you'll salivate to see I took the bait. Don't get used to it.
A 3rd party says---
I know i can be hard to understand--but being unbiased and having a personal opinion are two separate unrelated things..they are not one in the same. You CAN have an opinion--like everyone does on every subject..but how you act or treat that opinion and how it effects your judgment is what determines whether you are bias or unbias
UNBIASED can be defined as: fair, equitable, tolerant, neutral. Without bias or prejudice; impartial or objective.
OPINION can be defied as: An opinion is a person's ideas and thoughts towards something. It is an assessment, judgment or evaluation of something. An opinion is not a fact, because opinions are either not falsifiable, or the opinion has not been proven or verified.
The Media is not unbiased--they clearly present their motivations strictly to one side or another.. They are not journalists any more--they are not out t5here to report the truth or the facts for both sides--they clearly want the news to be skewed to one side or another for attractiveness or to serve a purpose instead of letting those watching make a determination for themselves. They are all nothing but editorialists giving their slants--not presenting facts or views for equal consideration. Until a media gives equal time to equal sides or view to a position in its presentations, they can never be unbiased... They are panderers--not journalists....
As for MC..well in my opinion

people can have an opinion and still remain objective and unbiased. In other words--someone CAN choose to see a side or have an opinion, but also they can also choose to not be closed-minded to just their own thoughts on the subject and remain unbiased... They can be willing to try and see other views and sides and understand why someone may see something that way and respect that and see how it may apply to a situation and not let their opinions cloud that view to make a solid determinations based on both arguments or sides to an issue... Most people can do that....but not everyone...
Douche says---
<Trimmed down to eliminate babble> As a matter of fact, I think you're so biased, you're unable to see my side of the issue objectively and will stoop to calling me names.
I say---
I never said my
opinions were right for you or that you had to agree. I realize the difference between opinion and fact AND bias. I also realize there can be/are opinions presented as facts to sway peoples beliefs. The market is a great example of spin doctors tweaking stats in headlines to suit their needs. I think that's the part we agree on as
fact. That the media can and will make a great case for whatever it is they want you to believe. IMO if you have opinions force fed enough they can become assimilated as fact and/or bias thanks to herd mentality. The fact is herd mentality is part of human nature. My firm opinion on this is capitalism has evolved to prey on the human minds inherent weakness. Be it a need to subscribe to a single political party, organized religion, wearing clothes are "in" this season or the need to have a 100" lcd tv to one up your neighbors.
Where our opinion differs is you feel Dems "own" the media, I feel different as stated. I feel the media is a tool used by capitalistic pigs from any and all political parties and walks of life. If Dems owned the media why do we have to put up with all parties propaganda and dirt digging commercials? Here's where I get angry...you or I are meaningless in the big picture. The rich fund the candidate that will better their power and/or financial situation. So this mudslinging is VERY costly and "we the people" can't afford to have any say that is meaningful enough to impact votes. This ties into my last statement that they feed us what they want us to believe on tv. It's legal brainwashing basically, this is why I don't watch commercials or news myself. So he with the most deep pocket funders and slickest
PR guy will in all likelihood win. There are plenty of wealthy republicans, it's not just the dems that have money they can use to brainwash through the media tiger.
Yes I call people sarcastic emphatic names when debating. It throws them off their game and it's a psychological tactic I employ from time to time. I'm young but enjoy watching Muhammad Ali videos of his boxing years where he rope-a-doped people and through psych warfare all but ensured his victory. Sad that such a sharp mind ahead of it's time is now rendered useless. Way sidetracked, whoops.
Remember...I wasn't the one coming in an index thread and ranting about a political party, so you start the fire and then whine about how hot it is? I think if you look past the point that I don't have an affiliation to your party of choice you'll see I really think both sides are dirty and reform is needed to bring TRUE "power to the people". As it stands today we have no power, and "absolute power corrupts absolutely".